Murray Ross

The critics weigh in

For several centuries critics have been debating the merits of our summer play, Love's Labor's Lost. "If we were to part with any of the author's comedies, it would should be this," begins William Hazlitt, one of Shakespeare's best 19th century interpreters. You might think that would introduce an essay of condemnation, but you would be mostly wrong:  Hazlitt goes on to affectionately praise the characters of Armado, Moth, Holofernes, Nathanial, and Berowne, as well as quoting several feliciious passages.  And while he claims that in this play Shakespeare's might genius has never been deployed on so slight a subject (as if "Titian had been employed to give grace to the curtls of a full bottomed periwig"), Hazlitt can't help but delight in the curls he dismisses.

George Bernard Shaw, who liked to compare his own great genius with his dramatic forebearer's, begins his essay in a similar negative vein:  "A performance of Love's Labor's Lost is a sort of entertainment to be valued for Shakespear's sake than for its own."  But Shaw too is beguiled by this "sunny, joyous and delightful play" he says, "Much of the verse is charming: even when it is rhymed doggrell it is full of that bewitching Shakespearean music which tempts the susceptible critic to sugar his ink and declare that Shakespear can do no wrong." His essay ends with the same doublemindedness:  "On the whole, I am not sure that Love's Labor's Lost is worth reviving at this time of day; but I am bound to add that if were announced to-morrow with an adequate cast, I should make a point of seeing it."

Our distinguished Prologue guest, Stephen Booth, one of the world's leading Shakespeare authorities, confessed a similar ambivilance in his podcast interview with Kevin Landis, which you can hear here:

http://www.theatreworkscs.org/resources/podcasts/StephenBooth.mp3

For a long time Professor Booth thought Love's Labor's was a play that was better to think about than see, but he has changed his mind.  You can hear more at his free Prologue talk in our Rock Ledge Ranch tent, Saturday, August 4, at 6:00 p.m.  The lecture is free for all.

Finally, that Pasha of Shakespeare critics, Harold Bloom, makes this remarkable confession:  "we all have particular favorities, in literature as in life, and I take more unmixed pleasure from Love's Laboru's Lost than from any Shakepearean play."  He goes on to say, "Alas, I have never seen a production of theis extravagent comedy that could begin to perform to is vocal magnificence, but I always live in hope that some director of genius will yet deliver it to us."

We cannot promise such a director, nor a company that would satisy this sultan of Shakespeare, but I have sent camels to tell him that here at Rock Ledge Ranch we have actors who can sing as well as be very silly (and silliness is purity, as a friend once explained).  And I have notified George Bernard Shaw in his empyreum that we have indeed an adequate cast, and that indeed he should make a point of seeing the production.  And so should you!

 

 

 

 

High Fashion in Navarre

Shakespeare rarely has anything specific to say about the locations of his plays, other than identifying them by name.  His geography is notoriously vague, and sometimes unreliable (Milan is a seaport in The Tempest).  Though he likes setting his action in European places that would have seemed exotic to most of his audience (Venice, Vienna, Verona, Sicily, Bohemia), in his theatre all these places would have looked nearly identical, since the stage of the Globe remained virtually unchanged from play to play.  Scenic specificity would have come largely from the costumes, which would often reflect contemporary fashon (nearly all Shakespeare plays were richly "modern dress" productions). 

Much has changed in 400 years, and because Shakespeare's scenic directions are both suggestive and vague, and because Shakespeare's universality seems to apply to virtually all cultures and ages, the variety of scenic invention in modern productions has been almost infinite.  One of the great things about working with Shakespeare is that he sets you free, and contemporary designers have embraced this freedom with gusto.

Shakespeare's Navarre, the home of Love's Labor's Lost is a typical opportunity.  Navarre was a Medieval kingdom near the Pyrenees, bordering Spain and France, in what is now Basque country. The play takes place entirely in this kingdom; actually it all happens in the park outside the King's home.This is all we know, and all we need to know.There are no references to Basques, to cheese, to goats, to mountains, or to names with x's in them.  Navarre floats like a fairy tale kingdom, untethered from google pinpointing.

In thinking about what Navarre might look, we began with the play itself--not its stage directions but its specific character.  Love's Labor's Lost is a wonderfully stylized comedy, light and playful, full of linguistic and choreographed patterns; it's an aristocratic world far more fanciful and artificial than any we actually live in. Kenneth Branagh's film version of the play subtracted most of the play and added a lot of Cole Porter, and the results were mixed--but his impulses are understandable, since style, elegance and silliness are what this play needs.

In London this spring I walked past the Prada store and saw this is the window:

And immediately I thought that looks like Navarre!  Or rather, this looks like what Navarre's visiting young ladies from France might wear, and the ladies always set the stage for fashion. Truly these are outfits for a Princess and her entourage. They are contemporary without belonging to any one decade. They are clothes for now, combining elements of the 20's and the 50's. They are light, and wittily patterned without being fussy.  They make you think of holiday and romance. And then there's the preposterous ostrich skin luggage.  

And the hats! European ladies of class and fun and distinction absolutely  must have hats, and very nice hats too.  Here's a cloche of Prada's, in the next window.

Lovely, no?  I was so taken with the Prada spring collection that I asked our board if we could spend our entire endowment and buy out the London store for our show--well, half the store.  After a not very long deliberation, this proposal was rejected. So I showed these pictures to our gifted costume designer, Ashley Gamba, and asked if she could create a comparable collection for our girls on shoestring budget, and since she works for THEATREWORKS, where there are no limits on aspirations, she said sure, no problem.  You will see her lovely work on our lovely lasses in two weeks.  And I asked a young milliner of our acquaintance, who has just returned from triumphs in Paris, if he might possibly make us adorable great hats---for free.  With perhaps just a few surrealistic touches, since our Navarre is also derived from the dream-like surrealism of Miro, Magritte and Dali. He said of course, no problem.  And so he has; the hats are winging their way to us from London as I write. Ladies and Gentlemen, here are the hats of Navarre, designed by the incomparable Harvy Santos.

The Princess of France:

Her very good friend, the snappy Rosaline, who has a stinging wit:

The lovely and very fetching Katherine:

And the fair flighty Maria:

Aren't they wonderful?  Take that, Prada!  You can see more of Harvy's fabulous work here:

www.harvash.com

And you can see more of the wonders of Navarre out at Rock Ledge Ranch beginning August 2. Navarre has never looked so good!